Kantata Marketing

  • How Kantata is Helping Businesses Unleash the Power of Professional Services

    How Kantata is Helping Businesses Unleash the Power of Professional Services

    Powerful currents are reshaping the professional services industry. Only the best providers of Professional Services Automation (PSA) software are able to equip their clients with the solutions and expertise they need to stay ahead of the curve. The vendors that lead the charge into a new era of PSA will have the specialized focus and domain expertise to understand the evolving needs of professional services organizations, as well as the scale to turn those needs into ground-breaking solutions.

    That’s why Kimble and Mavenlink have joined forces to form Kantata, the #1 provider of PSA solutions according to SoftwareReviews’ Professional Services Automation Emotional Footprint Grid. In this blog, which accompanies our new report  “Unleash the Power of Professional Services with Purpose-Built Software,” learn more about why users say Kantata is uniquely able to drive transformational outcomes for their business, as well as how adopting the Kantata Professional Services Cloud can unleash the power of your professional services workforce. 

    How Does SoftwareReviews Determine Its Emotional Footprint Grid Champion?

     

    SoftwareReviews evaluates 27 aspects of the customer relationship using a net promoter methodology. These ratings include provocative, detailed questions on the experience of working with the vendor, creating a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment for their Emotional Footprint rating.

    Kantata was placed at the very top of the list of 13 PSA providers SoftwareReviews evaluated, earning Emotional Footprint Champion status with a 9.3 overall Customer Experience Score. Kantata also led the category with a +93 Net Emotional Footprint score, showing incredible performance across all aspects of the customer relationship.

    What Are Customers Saying About Kantata?

     

    Through SoftwareReviews’ evaluation, Kantata was shown to empower users and administrators, who are delighted with the support they receive. According to SoftwareReviews user review data,100% of users agree that:

    • Kantata is critical to their success
    • Kantata enables them to increase their performance
    • They love using Kantata

    As a purpose-built industry cloud designed for specific needs of professional services organizations, Kantata’s unique breadth and singular focus on the professional services industry puts it at the vanguard of innovation in the PSA category. From the introduction of Talent Network capabilities that transform how services businesses work with their external workforce, to ground-breaking innovations on the Salesforce platform that bring information in Sales Cloud, Revenue Cloud, Tableau, Slack, and so much more, Kantata is leading the way and unlocking transformative opportunities for its clients.

    SoftwareReviews’ results confirm Kantata’s role as a leader in the PSA category, with high marks for continuous improvement of their products, their capacity to help clients innovate, and ultimately their ability to inspire clients to reach new heights. This has enabled Kantata to exceed customer expectations by delivering exceptional value through a unique and comprehensive portfolio of industry-focused products and capabilities across multiple platforms. With the Kantata Professional Services Cloud, a better, faster, more efficient way of doing business is possible today.

    Unlocking Sustainable Growth and Long-Term Success With Kantata

     

    The professional services industry is rapidly changing, and the technology needs of professional services organizations are changing just as quickly – leading professional services teams across the globe are working with Kantata to stay ahead of the curve. With Kantata, today’s businesses can give their teams the clarity, control, and confidence they need to make true, lasting success in the constantly evolving professional services industry possible. What could adopting the Kantata Cloud mean for your professional services organization?

    Learn more about what’s possible with Kantata in our new report, “Unleash the Power of Professional Services with Purpose-Built Software,” which highlights key insights derived from the SoftwareReviews’ Professional Services Automation Emotional Footprint Report.

    , ,

  • The Impact of Shifting Talent Pools on a Changing Labor Market

    The Impact of Shifting Talent Pools on a Changing Labor Market

    On the latest episode of Kantata’s Professional Services Pursuit Podcast, our hosts Brent Trimble and Banoo Behboodi discuss how the professional services talent pool is shifting, both in terms of what employees expect from the organizations they work for and the values they want to see when applying to work at a new company. This episode highlights recent research by McKinsey & Company, which reveals more and more individuals are leaning towards contract work or running their own business as opposed to taking a more traditional career path. This blog is a snapshot of some of the key themes of the episode, focusing on the three main drivers behind the shifting labor market. You can listen to the entire 30-minute episode or read the transcript here.

    Why is the Talent Pool Shifting?

    In reference to what McKinsey calls the “The Great Attrition,” co-host Brent Trimble lays out a few reasons behind the current state of the labor market and why businesses are experiencing such a high degree of change. One reason is that individuals in the workforce are reshuffling — they’re not only leaving their current position, they’re leaving their current industry entirely and starting a brand new career path. The second reason behind the shifting labor pool is the gravitational pull of temporary, contract, or consultant-like work, which is pulling people away from full-time employee roles

    1. More Flexibility

      When it comes to how employees think about flexibility, co-host Banoo Behboodi says, “ultimately they’re doing what they’re doing because they’re looking for either more flexibility, more meaningful work, compensation or a healthier work-life balance…we seem to have stepped into a completely revolutionized way of looking at what workplace flexibility means.” Working remotely has become the norm, with talent spread across locations, time zones, and even countries. Employees want flexible schedules and options outside of the traditional expectations of commuting to an office and reporting Monday through Friday, nine to five.

    2. Healthy Work-Life Balance

      Core to the change in the labor market is a fundamental shift in how people approach a healthy work-life balance. People want to be able to both work and take care of responsibilities at home without the fear of burn out. Brent refers to this evolution as people “reassessing the demands of life…re-evaluating and maybe looking at all this time that traditionally they would have spent either commuting or on business travel and now saying, let’s fill this with something else.” Being able to work not just remotely, but work for yourself or on a contract-basis gives individuals some time back that they did not have before. They are looking for jobs that allow them to have a healthy and balanced life outside of the “office.”

    3. Opportunities for Career Advancement

      In today’s market, individuals expect the opportunity to learn, evolve, and advance within an organization. Banoo points out that “one of the top motivators is career development and advancement and what companies are doing for them from that perspective…There should be paths for individuals that are comfortable being individual contributors to also make career advancements.” In McKinsey’s research, 41% of individuals being surveyed chose to leave their job due to lack of career advancement opportunities. You have to be willing and eager to invest in your employees if you would like to attract and retain top talent.

    How to Adapt to the Changing Labor Market?

    Nearly all industries are feeling the impact of the shifting labor market. While the task of adapting to new expectations and shifting values may seem daunting, Brent provides three suggestions for where to start.

    1. Sharpen your traditional employee value proposition and provide career development options.
    2. Build a non-traditional value proposition — flexibility, personal relationships between employees, positive and engaging culture, and different forms of career progression — and make it more personal.
    3. Broaden your talent sourcing approach, looking at people with non-traditional backgrounds.
    Want to Learn More?

    If you’re interested in learning more, you can listen to the entire 30-minute episode or read the transcript at this link. Subscribe to the The Professional Services Pursuit Podcast for expert advice, trends, and best practices surrounding professional services.

    ,
    , , , ,

  • How Expense Management Software Improves Cost Visibility and Control Across Projects

    How Expense Management Software Improves Cost Visibility and Control Across Projects

    Revenue leakage in professional services (PS) rarely announces itself. It accumulates in small gaps: a client dinner logged too late to invoice, a project material categorized as overhead when the contract made it billable, a consultant’s travel expenses sitting unsubmitted at month-end while the invoice has already gone out. Individually, each gap seems small. But across a full slate of projects and teams, they start to add up — and fast.

    Expense management software closes these gaps by capturing, categorizing, approving, and reimbursing business expenses. For PS leaders, it also provides a financial control layer that helps determine whether project costs land in the right place, expenses actually get billed, and margin reported on a project reflects what delivery actually cost.

    What Is Expense Management Software?

    Expense management software is a system that handles the full lifecycle of business expenses, from initial capture through approval, reimbursement, and financial reporting. The core workflow is consistent across most platforms: an employee incurs a cost, submits it with supporting documentation, a manager reviews and approves it, the finance team processes reimbursement, and the expense is recorded in the appropriate account or project code.

    What separates basic expense tools from purpose-built solutions for project-based businesses is project allocation. In a PS firm, it’s not enough to know that $3,400 was spent on travel in March. The question is which project each trip was in support of, whether those costs are billable to the client, and whether they were captured in time to appear on the next invoice. Without that level of specificity, expense data is accurate for accounting purposes but useless for project profitability analysis.

    There are three categories of expenses that PS firms need to manage, and each carries different implications for billing and margin:

    • Billable Expenses: This includes travel, lodging, client entertainment, project materials passed through to the client. These must be captured precisely — missed billable expenses are direct margin loss
    • Non-Billable Expenses: This includes internal meetings, staff training, overhead costs absorbed by the firm. These still need tracking to understand true project cost and profitability
    • Reimbursable Expenses: This includes out-of-pocket spend by employees, like travel, meals, and incidentals. Reimbursement accuracy and speed directly affects employee experience and compliance

    Most expense management problems in PS organizations aren’t caused by employees spending too much. They’re caused by expenses being logged late, mis-categorized, or disconnected from the project record — which means they either don’t get billed or aren’t accurately accounted for against project cost.

    How Expense Management Software Works

    The mechanics are straightforward. Employees capture receipts via mobile app or upload, tag each expense to a project or cost center, and submit for approval. The system routes the submission to the right approver based on predefined rules, sorting them by amount, expense category, project, or team. Approved expenses flow into reimbursement processing and sync with the financial system, updating project actuals in real time.

    The operational value of that flow depends on what happens at both ends. On the submission side, the easier the capture process, the faster and more completely expenses get logged. Mobile receipt scanning, calendar-based expense suggestions, and integration with corporate card feeds all reduce the gap between when costs are incurred and when they appear in the system.

    On the financial side, the value depends on how tightly expense data connects to project financials. When expenses sync directly with project cost tracking and billing workflows, project managers can see budget-vs-actual in real time, finance can close the month without manual reconciliation, and billable expenses make it onto invoices without a separate review step. When expense data lives in a separate system, all of that requires manual effort, which can introduce delays and errors.

    Why Expense Management Matters More for Professional Services

    Every business tracks expenses. But professional services organizations have additional reasons to take it seriously — and a more specific problem to solve.

    In most industries, expense management is primarily an internal financial control: categorize costs, reimburse employees, close the books. In PS, it’s that and something more consequential. Expenses are incurred inside active client engagements, often under contract terms that determine what gets billed and what gets absorbed.

    Without real-time visibility into where those costs are landing as they occur, project managers are making budget and delivery decisions against incomplete data. It’s this cost visibility across projects is what turns expense management from a finance function into an operational one.

    Billable expense recovery is direct revenue.

    In most PS engagements, certain project costs — like travel, accommodation, materials, or sub-contractor fees — are contractually recoverable from the client. Expenses that aren’t captured, aren’t categorized correctly, or aren’t submitted before an invoice goes out are simply lost.

    Unlike unbilled time, which generally still exists in a timesheet record, unsubmitted expenses often leave no trace. Even 1% expense leakage on a $1M engagement is $10,000 that the firm worked to earn, but didn’t collect.

    Project margin depends on accurate cost data.

    A project showing a 30% margin in the financial system looks different if $15,000 in project expenses were labeled as overhead rather than part of an individual engagement. Accurate expense allocation is what makes project profitability data reliable. And reliable project data is what allows firms to forecast accurately, estimate confidently, and understand which types of work actually generate margin.

    Approval workflows enforce policy before the cost is incurred.

    Expense policies only work if they’re enforced consistently. Manual processes depend on approvers catching mistakes in paperwork. Automated workflows, however, are able to flag policy exceptions at submission, route high-value or out-of-policy expenses to appropriate reviewers automatically — while also creating an audit trail that supports compliance.

    Month-end close quality depends on how complete expense data is.

    Finance teams in PS firms often spend a lot of time at period close chasing missing expense submissions, reconciling credit card statements against project codes, and manually allocating costs that should have been tagged at submission. This reconciliation work not only delays the ability to close the books, but also delays accurate margin reporting. Staying on budget across projects requires the cost data to be current, not weeks behind.

    What to Look for in Expense Management Software

    The market ranges from standalone expense tools focused on reimbursement to fully integrated expense modules inside PSA platforms. For PS firms, the right choice depends on whether expense data needs to connect to project financials — and for most, it does.

    Some things to consider when choosing an expense management software:

    • Project-level allocation: The ability to tag every expense to a specific project, phase, or client. This is the foundation of billable expense recovery and project profitability reporting.
    • Billable vs. non-billable classification: Expenses should be classifiable at submission as billable to the client or absorbed by the firm. This determines what appears on invoices and what shows up in project cost.
    • Mobile capture and low-friction submission: The faster and easier it is to log an expense, the faster it enters the system. Receipt scanning and calendar-based expense suggestions reduce delays and improve data completeness.
    • Configurable approval workflows: Routing rules based on amount, category, project, and policy exception keep approvals moving for both routine spend and high-value or out-of-policy items.
    • Integration with project financials and billing: Approved expenses should flow directly into project actuals and billing workflows without manual re-entry. When the expense and billing systems share data, billable costs make it onto invoices and project margin reflects actual delivery cost in real time.
    • Policy enforcement at the point of submission: Spend limits, category rules, and policy flags applied automatically at submission, rather than caught during review, keep compliance consistent without adding friction to approvers.

    The Bottom Line on Expense Management Software

    Expense management software is an integral part of how PS firms protect the margin they’ve already earned. The time between incurring a cost and recovering it determines how much leakage occurs along the way.

    Firms with tight, project-connected, tech-led expense processes close that window. But those relying on manual submission, disconnected approvals, or end-of-month reconciliation leave it open. The difference is rarely visible in any single transaction, but it compounds across every project, every month, and every engagement until it shows up as the gap between what was delivered and what was actually collected.

    For firms already running a PSA platform, the best bet is to opt for an expense management feature that’s embedded in the same system, rather than a standalone tool. Keeping time, expenses, project financials, and billing in a single, connected environment eliminates the reconciliation work that disconnected systems create and ensures that the margin visibility leadership needs isn’t dependent on a manual sync between two platforms.

    See how Kantata ensures you’re able to always deliver amazing on every engagement by tying expense management to project financials, billing, and margin visibility in one system.

    ,

  • How Capacity Planning Helps Services Teams Stay Aligned with Project Demand

    How Capacity Planning Helps Services Teams Stay Aligned with Project Demand

    Most delivery problems in professional services don’t start on the project. They start weeks earlier, when someone committed to work the team didn’t actually have capacity to take on. By the time that shows up as a missed deadline or an overloaded consultant, the window to fix it cleanly has already closed.

    That’s the problem capacity planning solves. It’s the process of comparing what a team can realistically deliver against what the pipeline and the business need from it — surfacing mismatches early enough to act on them rather than absorb them. More than 66% of PS organizations turn down work due to resourcing constraints. In many cases, the capacity was there. The visibility wasn’t.

    What Is Capacity Planning?

    Capacity planning is the process of comparing what a team can deliver against what the business needs it to deliver across active projects and the pipeline ahead. The goal is to surface mismatches between supply and demand early enough to act on them, whether that means adjusting staffing, renegotiating timelines, prioritizing pipeline differently, or accelerating a hiring decision.

    Three terms get used interchangeably in this space, but doing so can cause real problems — making it worth distinguishing the difference between them:

    • Capacity planning: The portfolio-level view of total team supply vs. total project demand (do we have enough capacity to take on what’s in the pipeline?)
    • Resource planning: Allocating specific people to specific tasks within individual projects (Who works on which project, for how many hours, and when?)
    • Capacity management: The ongoing discipline of monitoring and adjusting capacity over time (are we staying aligned as demand and conditions shift?)

    Firms that manage capacity at the project level only – where individual project managers optimize their own allocations independently – tend to miss portfolio-level signals until they’ve already become problems. A resource conflict that looks manageable on one project may not be so easy to navigate when two projects are competing for the same person. Only the portfolio view reveals that.

    What Is Capacity Utilization Rate and Why Does It Matter?

    Capacity utilization rate is the core metric of capacity planning. It answers a simple question: Of all the hours your team has available, how many are actually going towards billable work?

    Let’s break down how to calculate capacity utilization:

    Billable hours worked ÷ Total available hours × 100 = Capacity Utilization Rate

    The resulting number is a planning input, not just a performance readout. Used retrospectively, it tells you how well capacity was used. Used prospectively for forecasting, it tells you what’s coming — and whether the team can handle it.

    The SPI 2026 Professional Services Maturity Benchmark — based on a global survey of 509 firms — makes the delivery stakes clear: high-performing PS organizations generate 169% more professional services revenue than their peers while running leaner operations. The firms at the top of the maturity curve treat utilization as a forward-looking planning metric, not a lagging performance indicator.

    The target range most PS firms work toward sits between 70% and 80% billable utilization, a range that sustains productivity and margin without pushing teams into the kind of sustained overload that drives burnout and attrition. Below 70% and bench time is eroding margin. Consistently above 85% and the risks shift to delivery quality and workforce stability. The goal is maintaining the range, not maximizing the number.

    Why Capacity Planning Matters for Professional Services

    The need for capacity planning shows up in specific, recurring operational problems that PS leaders know well.

    Pipeline and delivery run on different clocks. Sales cycles move at their own pace, and project delivery has its own timeline. Capacity planning is the mechanism that connects them, translating pipeline probability into staffing decisions before a project starts, rather than scrambling after it closes. A firm that waits until a deal is signed to assess whether it has the people to deliver it will frequently find itself behind before day one.

    Turning down work has a real cost — but so does saying yes to the wrong work. Organizations with poor capacity visibility tend toward one of two failure modes: they decline opportunities they could have handled, or they commit to work their teams can’t deliver well. Both have financial consequences. The 66% of PS firms reporting resource-driven turndowns aren’t all genuinely out of capacity. Many simply lack the visibility to know whether they can take something on. Good capacity planning narrows that gap.

    It’s important to understand why resource management matters at the organizational level when it comes to capacity planning. Utilization variance compounds. A team running at 60% for a quarter is losing margin today and signaling that something upstream needs attention. A team at 90% is building toward burnout, turnover, and the project delays that follow. Neither situation is obvious without the planning infrastructure to see it, and both get harder to correct the longer they persist.

    How to Do Resource Capacity Planning: A 4-Step Process

    The mechanics of capacity planning are straightforward. Applying them consistently and at the right level of the organization is where most firms fall short.

    • Map current capacity: Start with a clear accounting of available hours across the team, factoring in PTO, non-billable commitments, training time, internal meetings, and existing project allocations. This is the supply baseline. Planning against gross headcount without these deductions is one of the most common sources of systematic overcommitment.
    • Assess pipeline demand: Work with sales and account management to translate pipeline into resourcing estimates. Probability-weighted pipeline (for example, a 70%-probability deal estimated at 800 hours contributes 560 hours of expected demand) gives a more honest forward view than treating every open deal as certain. The goal is a realistic picture of what’s likely to land and when.
    • Identify the gaps: Compare supply to demand across a rolling planning horizon, typically 30, 60, and 90 days out. Gaps show up as either excess capacity (bench risk, margin drag) or over-allocation (delivery risk, burnout signal). Accurate resource estimation is what makes this step reliable.
    • Adjust and act: Decisions made here (like hiring, contractor sourcing, timeline negotiation, pipeline prioritization) are far less costly than the same decisions made under pressure mid-project. The earlier the gap is visible, the more options are available.

    Common Capacity Planning Mistakes

    Most capacity planning problems aren’t methodological. They’re structural — the result of how planning is organized and how frequently it happens.

    • Planning at the project level only: When individual project managers optimize their own allocations without portfolio visibility, resource conflicts hide until they surface as delivery problems. A shared allocation that looks fine on one project can be untenable when two projects are competing for the same person. Portfolio-level capacity planning surfaces those conflicts before they become crises.
    • Using headcount as a proxy for capacity: Ten consultants working 40-hour weeks is not 400 billable hours. Non-billable time, internal commitments, PTO, and training routinely account for 20–30% of available hours. Planning against gross headcount without modeling real availability leads to commitments the team structurally cannot keep.
    • Treating capacity planning as a quarterly event: Demand shifts faster than quarterly cadences. When things happen like a deal closing three weeks ahead of forecast, a project extending by a month, or a key team member going on leave, the capacity picture changes. The firms that manage this well maintain a rolling view that updates as conditions shift, not a static plan that’s refreshed once a season.

    How Technology Changes the Equation

    Capacity planning in a spreadsheet works at a small scale. But as portfolio complexity grows, the manual work of reconciling resource schedules, project data, and pipeline inputs becomes its own constraint — and a primary driver of declining project performance in growing PS firms. The gaps in visibility don’t announce themselves; they build quietly until a delivery problem brings them to light.

    Capacity planning is how a services firm moves from knowing it has a team to knowing what that team can actually take on. Done well, it keeps delivery aligned with pipeline, utilization in a sustainable range, and resource decisions made early enough to be deliberate rather than desperate. The data required is already inside most PS organizations — the question is whether the systems and habits are in place to act on it.

    PSA platforms give PS leaders a connected view of projects, resources, and pipeline in a single system, enabling firms to shift from periodic capacity reviews to continuous monitoring. Rather than a snapshot taken once a month and acted on until the next one, capacity becomes a live picture that updates as project conditions, resource availability, and pipeline probability change. This cadence difference — periodic versus continuous — is what separates firms that proactively manage capacity from firms that react to it.

    Learn how Kantata can take your capacity planning from reactive to proactive, so your team can always deliver amazing on every engagement, no matter the scope.

  • What Is Agentic AI and Why It Matters for Professional Services Firms

    What Is Agentic AI and Why It Matters for Professional Services Firms

    Generative AI taught businesses that AI could create. It could draft content, synthesize data, and answer complex questions with reasonable accuracy. That shift was real and valuable. What’s happening now is something different.
    Agentic AI can act. Rather than waiting for a human to issue each instruction, agentic systems perceive their environment, reason through what needs to happen, and execute across connected tools and workflows.

    For professional services firms, where delivery depends on dozens of real-time decisions across every project, this change in how AI operates carries significant consequences. According to Kantata’s 2026 State of the Professional Services Industry Report, 89% of PS leaders say future revenue growth will depend more on how effectively they scale AI than on how they scale headcount.

    What Is Agentic AI?

    Agentic AI refers to AI systems designed to pursue goals autonomously. While traditional AI identifies patterns in data, and generative AI produces content based on a prompt, agentic AI takes those capabilities further by using them to complete work — autonomously, across multiple steps, without requiring a human to initiate each one.

    The word ‘agentic’ comes from ‘agency,’ meaning the capacity to act independently rather than respond to individual commands. An agentic system perceives its environment, determines what action is required, executes that action across connected systems, and adapts based on what it learns from the outcome.

    Let’s look at an example: Ask a generative AI tool to draft a client follow-up email, and it produces a draft. Monitoring the same situation, an agentic system would identify the overdue milestone, assess its impact on the project schedule, draft and send the appropriate message, update the project record, and escalate to the project manager if the issue crosses a defined risk threshold. These have the same starting conditions, but fundamentally different operational footprints.

    Agentic AI vs. Generative AI: What’s the Difference?

    Generative AI and agentic AI are related, but each has its unique abilities and purposes. Understanding the distinction is worth the two minutes it takes.
    Put plainly: Generative AI makes individual contributors faster. Agentic AI changes how work flows through an organization.

    Generative AI is reactive. Give it a prompt, receive an output. Each task is self-contained. The human determines what comes next.

    Agentic AI, on the other hand, is proactive. Give it a goal, and it determines the steps, executes them in sequence, monitors progress, and adjusts when conditions change. It also regularly uses generative AI as a tool along the way; for example, an agent might call an LLM to draft a proposal section, then route it for approval, update the relevant CRM record, and notify the account team. Generative AI handles the creative step; the agent handles the process surrounding it.

    How Does Agentic AI Work?

    Agentic systems generally run on a continuous four-stage cycle:

    • Perceive: The agent ingests data from connected systems — project management tools, CRM, financial records, resource schedules, communication threads. It builds a live picture of the conditions relevant to its goal.
      Reason: Using that data, the agent determines what action is warranted. This might involve comparing current state against targets, assessing risk, or identifying the next logical step in a multi-stage workflow.
    • Act: The agent executes: adjusting an allocation, surfacing a risk alert, triggering an approval workflow, sending a notification, or updating a record. Actions happen inside the connected tools the agent has access to.
    • Learn: Outcomes feed back into the agent’s model. Over time, and especially when the agent is grounded in data specific to a firm’s own projects and clients, its reasoning becomes more accurate and its actions more useful.
    • Consider this scenario: A project extends by one week. A traditional professional services automation (PSA) system records the change and surfaces it in the next review cycle. But an agentic system detects the extension immediately, identifies the downstream over-allocations it creates, presents the resource manager with specific reallocation options — and can even execute the adjustment upon approval.

    The gap between passive recording and active resolution is where agentic AI changes the calculus for PS delivery. Kantata’s Resourcing Agent operates on this principle, continuously monitoring staffing data and flagging, or acting on, resource risks before they escalate.

    Why Agentic AI Matters for Professional Services

    Every industry will feel the effects of agentic AI. Professional services firms have specific structural reasons to take it seriously now:

    • Delivery is a continuous stream of decisions: Staffing adjustments, scope changes, budget variances, client escalations — these don’t arrive on a schedule. They surface constantly across every active engagement. No team can monitor all of it in real time. Agents can, and they can surface or act on signals before they compound into expensive problems.
    • Resourcing constraints are intensifying: More than 66% of PS organizations reported turning down work due to resource limitations, according to Kantata’s research. Agentic AI extends what existing teams can accomplish without proportional headcount growth, handling monitoring, coordination, and routine decision-making that currently consumes significant human capacity.
    • Institutional knowledge tends to sit idle: Professional services firms accumulate deep expertise across years of engagements — how to scope accurately, which approaches work for which client types, what delivery patterns signal risk. That knowledge lives in project records, proposals, and the experience of senior practitioners. Agentic AI grounded in a firm’s own data can surface that knowledge at the moment it’s needed and apply it at scale. This is what separates AI that automates yesterday’s processes from AI that makes every consultant perform like your most experienced one.
    • The data infrastructure is already in place: Firms running PSA platforms hold project histories, financial outcomes, resource performance data, and client records in a single system. That data is precisely what agentic AI needs to reason and act effectively. Organizations already operating on mature PSA infrastructure are closer to agentic readiness than most realize.

    Where Agentic AI Is Already Showing Up in Professional Services

    Adoption is advancing faster than the conversation suggests. Three areas are seeing tangible early traction:

    Resource management

    Agents that monitor staffing continuously, detect overallocation or schedule drift, and surface recommended adjustments before they become delivery risks. The operational value is substantial: resource managers spend less time chasing signals and more time making consequential decisions with reliable information.

    Proposal and scoping

    Agents that draw from past project data to build accurate scopes, identify relevant precedents, and suggest resource configurations. Reducing the manual burden of proposal development while improving what gets committed to clients addresses one of the most consistent sources of margin erosion in PS delivery.

    Delivery oversight

    Agents that track project health across all active engagements simultaneously — monitoring budget burn, milestone progress, team and client sentiment — and surface risks as they emerge. That shift from periodic review to continuous monitoring is a meaningful operational change for portfolio-level leaders.

    What Agentic AI Means for How PS Firms Compete

    Enterprise software has automated tasks for decades. What makes agentic AI different is that it operates in context, learns from experience, and compounds in value over time.

    A firm whose agents are trained on its own project history, delivery patterns, and client outcomes will produce better staffing recommendations, more accurate proposals, and faster risk interventions than one using a generic model. That advantage grows with every engagement completed. Automation alone is table stakes. The firms that lead will be those that use AI to scale their expertise, not just their throughput.

    Agentic AI deployed on generic models automates tasks. Agentic AI grounded in a firm’s own domain knowledge reshapes how that firm delivers, competes, and grows. The distinction matters, and acting on it deliberately is what separates the firms building durable advantage from those running faster on the same treadmill.

    Learn how Kantata is building agentic AI specifically for the needs of services delivery — ensuring every PS firm can always deliver amazing for their clients.

    ,

  • Top PSA Software Compared: Which Solution Is Best for Your Business?

    Top PSA Software Compared: Which Solution Is Best for Your Business?

    PSA evaluations are hard to get right. The platform a professional services (PS) organization chooses will shape how it staffs engagements, manages project financials, and scales delivery — often for years before a replacement conversation even comes up. That makes clarity during evaluation less of a convenience and more of a competitive advantage.

    One key point to remember before diving in: PSA software is a distinct category from general project management tools. It connects resource management, project delivery, time tracking, financial management, and business intelligence in a single system — and that scope is exactly what makes choosing the right one for your needs so important.

    Let’s break down seven of the leading PSA options on the market today.

    Top PSA Software:

    • Kantata
    • Certinia
    • Rocketlane
    • BigTime
    • Planview
    • Autotask
    • Ruddr

    What to Consider Before Comparing Platforms

    The right PSA platform depends on how your firm operates, not on which vendor demo runs most smoothly. According to research from Service Performance Insight, high-performing PS organizations show measurably better outcomes: higher billable utilization, stronger project margins, and faster delivery. That gap widens with organizational complexity.

    Four factors to consider when choosing a PSA software:

    • Org size and complexity: A 30-person agency and a 3,000-person consultancy have different needs. Check that a platform’s customer base reflects your scale.
    • Delivery model fit: Fixed-fee, time and materials, managed services, and SaaS implementation engagements each demand different billing and resource tracking capabilities.
    • Integration depth: CRM-to-delivery connectivity, ERP integrations, and financial system compatibility are make-or-break for enterprise buyers. The advantages of a Salesforce-native PSA are substantial for organizations already on that platform.
    • Implementation realism: A great platform implemented poorly delivers nothing. Ask the right questions before you commit to any vendor.

    With those criteria in mind, here are seven platforms worth your attention, along with the context to evaluate them clearly.

    Looking for a deeper evaluation framework? Check out the Tech Buyer’s Guide to PSA Software for an in-depth look at what really matters when evaluating PSA solutions.

    The Top PSA Software Platforms Compared

    Kantata

    Purpose-built PSA for enterprise professional services organizations

    Kantata is the only PSA platform built exclusively for professional services from the ground up. Where most PSA tools start as project management or ERP software and add PS functionality over time, Kantata was designed from day one around the way services organizations actually operate: managing billable people across complex, client-facing project portfolios where every staffing decision carries a direct financial consequence. The platform covers the full services lifecycle in a single environment — from pipeline-driven resource forecasting through project delivery, financial management, and portfolio intelligence. Over 1,500 customers across 100+ countries run their PS operations on Kantata, supported by the Expertise Engine, an AI layer purpose-built for PS firms that turns accumulated project knowledge into forward-looking staffing, scoping, and delivery intelligence.

    Built for:

    • Mid-market to enterprise PS organizations: management consulting, IT services, agencies, software & hi-tech
    • Organizations managing complex, multi-entity, multi-geography project portfolios
    • Salesforce shops (Kantata SX) and organizations on open infrastructure (Kantata OX)

    Key Features:

    • Real-time resource management from pipeline forecasting through skills-based staffing
    • Project financial management with native margin, utilization, and revenue recognition tracking
    • AI-powered Expertise Engine for staffing recommendations, scoping intelligence, and delivery risk signals
    • Portfolio-level BI with expert-built PS dashboards, no custom report builds required
    • Kantata SX: Salesforce-native deployment with CRM-to-delivery data flow
    • Kantata OX: open infrastructure deployment for organizations not on Salesforce
    • Talent network access for contractor and freelancer resourcing

    Pros:

    • Purpose-built for PS from the ground up, with no compromises on billable utilization, margin tracking, or skills management
    • Dual deployment paths accommodate Salesforce and non-Salesforce organizations equally
    • AI that drives action, not just reporting — the Expertise Engine compounds value with every engagement

    Cons:

    • Premium pricing reflects enterprise depth, which may exceed budget for very small firms
    • Full-featured implementation requires commitment; not a self-serve setup

    Final Verdict

    Kantata is the benchmark for enterprise PS automation. Organizations serious about delivery performance, margin optimization, and scalable resource management will find no closer fit in the market.

    Certinia

    PSA built natively on the Salesforce platform

    Certinia (formerly FinancialForce) is a Salesforce-native PSA platform trusted by over 1,400 organizations worldwide. It connects project delivery, resource management, and financial management on the same Salesforce instance as CRM, giving sales and delivery teams a unified view of every customer engagement. The platform shines in organizations where Salesforce is the system of record. It surfaces AI-driven insights through Salesforce to handle complex billing models and deliver strong revenue recognition capabilities.

    Built for:

    • Mid to large enterprises already running Salesforce as their CRM/ERP backbone
    • IT services, software and hi-tech, consulting, and professional services firms
    • Organizations with complex financial management and compliance requirements

    Key Features:

    • Full Salesforce-native architecture — single customer record across CRM and delivery
    • AI-powered staffing and demand forecasting via Salesforce Einstein
    • Project management with Gantt charts, task tracking, and budget monitoring
    • Resource management with skills-based matching and capacity planning
    • Flexible billing: fixed-fee, T&M, subscription, and hybrid models
    • Real-time financial analytics and revenue forecasting

    Pros:

    • Deep Salesforce integration creates a genuine single source of truth for customer data
    • Strong project financial management with advanced revenue recognition
    • Well-suited for organizations with complex contracting and compliance requirements
    • Large customer base and established implementation partner ecosystem

    Cons:

    • Invoicing requires a separate Certinia Billing app — not included in the core PSA license
    • Requires a Salesforce license in addition to Certinia licensing
    • Steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with Salesforce; complex setup and customization
    • Reporting flexibility is limited without advanced Salesforce admin skills
    • Not a viable option for organizations not running Salesforce

    Final Verdict

    Certinia is a strong choice for Salesforce-native enterprises with complex financial requirements. Outside the Salesforce ecosystem, it has no natural home.

    Rocketlane

    AI-powered PSA with standout client collaboration and onboarding

    Rocketlane started as a customer onboarding platform and has expanded into a full PSA suite. Its strongest differentiation is the client experience layer: branded portals, shared project workspaces, and AI-powered delivery automation through its AI agents. For SaaS companies and services teams where the client-facing experience is a primary competitive advantage, Rocketlane offers capabilities that legacy PSA tools don’t prioritize. To understand how PSA software can automate key delivery workflows, Rocketlane’s approach is a useful reference point.

    Built for:

    • B2B SaaS companies running complex customer onboarding and implementation teams
    • Mid-market PS organizations (100–5,000 employees) prioritizing delivery speed and client experience
    • IT services and fintech firms managing structured, milestone-driven client engagements

    Key Features:

    • AI-powered agents for automated project plan generation, resource allocation, and risk flagging
    • Branded client portals with shared workspaces, timelines, and feedback tools
    • Time tracking, resource management, and financial management in one platform
    • SOW auto-generation and sales handoff automation
    • Built-in CSAT surveys at project milestones
    • CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) and Zapier/Workato support

    Pros:

    • Best-in-class client portal and collaborative delivery experience
    • AI agents are genuinely operational, covering resourcing, escalation detection, and plan generation
    • Highly intuitive UI with strong user adoption ratings on G2
    • Strong fit for SaaS onboarding and implementation-heavy delivery models

    Cons:

    • Financial management depth is generally lighter than enterprise PSA competitors
    • Complex resource management at enterprise scale requires additional configuration
    • Reporting customization noted as an area for improvement by users
    • Occasional minor performance lags reported with large project volumes

    H4: Final Verdict

    Rocketlane is a modern, well-designed platform with a compelling AI story and a genuinely strong client experience layer. Organizations prioritizing delivery speed and client satisfaction over deep financial management will find it a strong fit.

    BigTime

    Clean, focused PSA for small to mid-sized professional services firms

    BigTime is a well-regarded PSA platform known for strong time and expense tracking, intuitive invoicing, and DCAA compliance features that make it popular with government contractors. It targets firms from 5 to 500+ employees and delivers reliable coverage of the core PSA functions — project management, billing, resource allocation, and reporting — with an interface users consistently rate as approachable. The platform’s Foresight module unlocks advanced resource management, but it requires the highest subscription tier.

    Built for:

    • Accountants, engineers, architects, IT services, and management consultants (5-500 employees)
    • Firms with DCAA compliance requirements (like government contractors)
    • SMB and mid-market organizations seeking solid PSA fundamentals without enterprise complexity

    Key Features:

    • Customizable time and expense tracking with daily/weekly views and mobile app
    • Automated invoicing with custom templates, billing reminders, and QuickBooks sync
    • Project management with budget tracking, task management, and stoplight status
    • Resource management and utilization reporting in certain subscription tiers
    • DCAA-compliant timekeeping and audit trail
    • BI-ready data export to Power BI and Tableau
    • Shared project visibility in certain subscription tiers

    Pros:

    • Highly-rated time and expense tracking
    • Strong QuickBooks integration and DCAA compliance for regulated industries
    • Responsive customer support consistently praised in user reviews
    • Clean interface with a manageable learning curve at lower tiers

    Cons:

    • Resource management gated behind the highest subscription tier
    • Project scheduling limited to two levels of task hierarchy, which may be insufficient for complex projects
    • No native portfolio or program-level rollup reporting
    • Foresight pricing is non-transparent, requiring custom negotiation

    Final Verdict

    BigTime is a reliable, accessible PSA for small to mid-sized firms that need excellent time tracking, invoicing, and billing. Organizations expecting resource management as a core feature should plan for Premier-level spending or above.

    Planview

    Enterprise-grade PSA with deep portfolio and capacity planning capabilities

    Planview offers PSA capabilities through two products: Planview AdaptiveWork (formerly Clarizen) for enterprise project and work management, and Planview Changepoint for end-to-end PSA from CRM opportunity to billing. Planview’s roots are in Project Portfolio Management (PPM), and that heritage shows: its scenario planning, capacity forecasting, and portfolio-level analytics are among the most sophisticated available. The platform appeals to large organizations that need to manage PSA alongside strategic portfolio planning — particularly in IT services and management consulting.

    Built for:

    • Large enterprises and global consultancies managing diverse project portfolios at scale
    • IT services and managed services organizations with complex capacity planning needs
    • Organizations needing PSA integrated with PPM for portfolio-level governance

    Key Features:

    • End-to-end PSA lifecycle from opportunity/CRM through billing and revenue recognition
    • Advanced resource management with capacity forecasting, scenario planning, and skill-based allocation
    • Changepoint: strong financial management with multi-entity and multi-currency support
    • AdaptiveWork: enterprise work management with Agile and traditional delivery support
    • Real-time profitability, risk, and financial health analytics
    • ERP and CRM integrations including Microsoft ecosystem and Salesforce

    Pros:

    • Strong portfolio-level governance and scenario planning for large, complex organizations
    • Combines PPM and PSA in a single platform for organizations needing both
    • Strong Microsoft ecosystem integration and offline access capability
    • Proven enterprise scale — trusted by organizations across global geographies

    Cons:

    • UI rated as dated by users; Changepoint in particular carries a steep learning curve
    • Customization for specific business requirements is reported as challenging
    • Complex implementation — expect extended deployment timelines and significant admin resources
    • Pricing opacity makes total cost of ownership difficult to assess without a full vendor engagement

    Final Verdict

    Planview is built for enterprise organizations that need both PSA and portfolio management under one roof. The depth is genuine, but so is the implementation investment. Smaller organizations or those focused purely on delivery management will likely find it over-engineered for their needs.

    Autotask

    IT-specific PSA purpose-built for MSPs and technology service providers

    Autotask (owned by Kaseya/Datto) is the leading PSA platform in the managed services provider market. Its service desk, ticketing, contract management, and billing capabilities are tightly integrated and purpose-built for the MSP operational model. The platform connects with over 200 MSP tools, and its integration with Datto RMM is particularly powerful for organizations managing remote monitoring alongside PSA. Organizations running IT services and managed services will find Autotask’s feature depth hard to match in its niche.

    Built for:

    • IT managed service providers (MSPs) of all sizes
    • Technology service providers and IT consulting firms
    • Organizations whose core delivery model is recurring managed services, not project-based consulting

    Key Features:

    • Service desk with ticketing, SLA management, automated escalations, and queue management
    • Contract management for recurring services, Microsoft 365 licensing, and time-based billing
    • Project management with task tracking, milestone management, and resource scheduling
    • Time tracking and automated invoicing with QuickBooks Online integration
    • CRM with opportunity management, sales dashboard, and contact management
    • Inventory and procurement management across multiple sites
    • 200+ integrations including Datto RMM, major accounting tools, and MSP platforms

    Pros:

    • Best-in-class for MSP operations — ticketing, contract management, and SLA tracking are unmatched
    • Datto RMM integration creates a genuinely unified operational platform for IT service teams
    • Strong 200+ integration ecosystem tailored specifically to the MSP technology stack
    • Highly configurable for complex MSP workflows once properly set up

    Cons:

    • UI feels dated and navigation is reported as unintuitive, especially when moving quickly between tickets and contracts
    • Project management module is widely described as basic compared to dedicated PM tools
    • Steep configuration learning curve — poor setup produces poor results
    • Not designed for non-IT professional services; limited applicability outside the MSP/IT services niche
    • Implementation takes 4-8 weeks on average, but full optimization can take 3-6 months

    Final Verdict

    Autotask is the right choice for MSPs that need a purpose-built operational hub for IT service delivery. For consulting firms, agencies, or other PS organizations, the MSP-specific architecture creates friction rather than removing it.

    Ruddr

    Modern, lightweight PSA for small to mid-sized professional services firms

    Ruddr is a newer addition to the PSA category that has earned strong user satisfaction ratings — particularly for ease of use, transparent pricing, and responsive customer support. It targets organizations of 5 to 1,000 billable personnel who want enterprise-grade PSA visibility without enterprise complexity or cost. Where most PSA tools charge for every user, Ruddr’s pricing model only requires payment for billable personnel, making it cost-efficient for firms with significant non-billable headcount.

    Built for:

    • Small to mid-sized consulting, agency, IT, and management consulting firms (5-1,000 billable personnel)
    • Teams migrating from spreadsheets or basic time trackers who want proper PSA without a complex rollout
    • Organizations prioritizing clean UX, fast adoption, and transparent pricing

    Key Features:

    • Time tracking with intuitive timesheets, Slack integration, and automated reminders
    • Project and task management with real-time budget tracking and burn rate visibility
    • Resource allocation with availability tracking and utilization reporting
    • Financial reporting: realization rates, billable utilization, services margin, and revenue forecasting
    • Invoicing with customizable templates and QuickBooks Online integration
    • Expensify and BambooHR integrations; API access for custom connections

    Pros:

    • Generally considered easy to use
    • Pricing model charges only for billable users — strong cost efficiency for mixed teams
    • Fast time-to-value: most teams implement without professional services support
    • Responsive customer support consistently rated as exceptional

    Cons:

    • Limited advanced features compared to enterprise PSA platforms
    • Dashboard customization is constrained; users often export to Excel for deeper analysis
    • Integration ecosystem narrower than larger competitors — fewer third-party connections
    • Scalability ceiling: not designed for organizations above 1,000 billable personnel

    Final Verdict

    Ruddr is an excellent starting point for small teams that have outgrown spreadsheets but aren’t ready for an enterprise PSA rollout. Its simplicity is a feature, not a gap — for the right organization size.

    How to Choose the Right PSA Platform

    The comparison above reflects real differences in platform architecture, not just feature counts. Choosing well means matching your organization’s stage and complexity to the right tier of tool.

    A useful starting point: determine the key business outcomes you need technology to drive before evaluating any platform’s feature list. Tools that pass a demo rarely fail on features — they fail on fit.

    Three questions that help steer most evaluations:

    • Does it understand your delivery model? Ask vendors to walk through a PS-specific scenario — not a generic project demo. If they pivot to general project management workflows, that’s a signal.
    • How deep is its financial management? Billable utilization, project margin, revenue recognition, and multi-entity support are the financial requirements that generic tools consistently fail to cover natively.
    • Is the AI functional or cosmetic? Dashboards are table stakes in 2025. Platforms where AI drives staffing recommendations, flags delivery risk, and improves scoping accuracy create compounding operational value. Ask to see it in action during a demo.

    The most comprehensive PSA evaluation framework available is Kantata’s PSA Software Buyer’s Guide, which covers vendor selection, financial justification, and implementation planning in one resource.

    The Right PSA Software Compounds Over Time

    Every platform on this list can manage projects and track time. The differences emerge at scale, in how well a platform handles resource complexity, margin visibility, financial accuracy, and the operational demands of a growing PS organization. The tools that add value are the ones built for how PS organizations actually operate, not the ones adapted, configured, or retro-fitted to approximate it.

    If you’re ready to implement tools built specifically for the needs of the services industry, we’ve got you covered. Book a demo today and discover how Kantata can help you always deliver amazing for every engagement.

  • How Enterprise Management Software Supports Enterprise-Scale Project Execution

    How Enterprise Management Software Supports Enterprise-Scale Project Execution

    Most enterprise organizations already have plenty of tools. But what they often lack is coherence. Projects run in one platform, financials in another, resource data in a spreadsheet someone updated last Tuesday. At the level of complexity professional services (PS) firms operate at, fragmented infrastructure is a direct liability: every gap in visibility is a gap in margin.

    Enterprise management software closes those gaps. Designed for organizations managing large, inter-connected portfolios of work, it brings project execution, resource planning, financial management, and business intelligence into a single operational layer. Decisions become faster, risks surface earlier, and delivery performance becomes something you can actually predict and improve upon.

    Let’s break down what enterprise management software is, what it needs to do for professional services delivery organizations, and how to evaluate whether the platform you’re considering is genuinely built for the unique challenges PS firms face.

    What Is Enterprise Management Software?

    Enterprise management software refers to platforms built to help large organizations manage complex, cross-functional business processes at scale. The “enterprise” designation signals organizational complexity: multiple practice areas, geographies, client tiers, cost centers, and delivery teams operating simultaneously.

    Generic project tools work just fine for a single team running a handful of projects. Enterprise management software is what professional services firms need when managing scale across the full portfolio. This is what separates this category from standard project tools and gives enterprise-level businesses the ability to connect data across teams, automate workflows across functions, and give leaders visibility across an entire portfolio, rather than a single project.

    For PS organizations, the most relevant categories of enterprise management software include Professional Services Automation (PSA), Project Portfolio Management (PPM), and specialty delivery platforms that combine both. Understanding the project management lifecycle is key here, because enterprise software needs to support every step in the delivery process, from estimation and scoping through execution, closeout, and review.

    What Enterprise-Scale Project Execution Actually Demands

    Scale changes the nature of the challenge, not the magnitude. Bigger projects introduce their own set of operational pressures, making the infrastructure required to handle them structurally different from what works for a single team or a handful of engagements.

    There are several things to consider when executing enterprise-scale projects, including:

    Portfolio-Wide Visibility

    When dozens of engagements are running simultaneously across multiple teams and clients, the ability to see the health of any single project tells you very little. Leaders need a portfolio view, so that they can see the entire puzzle, not just one piece. This tells which engagements are at risk, where margins are drifting, which teams are overloaded, which resources are underdeployed, and more.

    Being able to track performance metrics at both the project and portfolio levels helps lay the foundation for running an enterprise PS operation profitably.

    Financial Management Woven Into Delivery

    At the scale in which enterprise organizations operate, project financial management cannot live in a separate system. Revenue recognition, cost tracking, and margin visibility need to be embedded in the delivery workflow, updating in real time as work progresses. Without this connection, finance and delivery are always working from different pictures of the same project, making reconciliation and revenue tracking nearly impossible.

    Resource Coordination Across the Organization

    Staffing a single project is hard enough. Coordinating resources across a large portfolio, where leaders are balancing competing priorities, high-performing resources are in demand across multiple engagements, and new deals are constantly entering the pipeline, requires a platform specifically built for these challenges. Now, more than ever, project management requires intelligent, data-driven resource allocation; manual scheduling and institutional memory just can’t cut it anymore.

    Scope and Change Control at Scale

    Scope creep quietly dismantles margins. Effective scope creep management requires tools that can surface budget variances early, route change requests through structured approval workflows, and give project managers the data to adjust their course of action before the damage is done.

    At the enterprise level, this needs to happen across every engagement simultaneously, not project by project through manual review.

    Where Generic Enterprise Tools Fall Short

    ERP systems, general work management suites, and broad project platforms each serve a purpose. But for professional services delivery, they possess a shared shortcoming: they were designed to serve the widest possible range of industries, which means they aren’ t necessarily optimized for specific use cases.

    Why professional services organizations need more than just an ERP comes down to one core issue: ERPs prioritize finance and back-office compliance. The specialized functions that define PS delivery excellence, including resource tracking, skills-based staffing, pipeline-to-capacity forecasting, and project-level margin intelligence, are either missing or require extensive custom configuration.

    This results in a workaround tax that compounds over time. Teams build parallel spreadsheets to track what the platform can’t surface natively, reporting takes days instead of hours, and staffing decisions get made on stale data. By the time a problem surfaces in the system, the project is already past the point where course-correcting can save time — and profit.

    CAPABILITYGENERIC ENTERPRISE TOOLSPURPOSE-BUILT PSA PLATFORMS
    Billing & utilization trackingAdd-on or absentNative, real-time, PS-specific
    Project financials & marginDisconnected from deliveryBuilt into every project workflow
    Skills-based staffingBasic availability onlySkills inventory + AI matching
    PS-specific BI & reportingCustom builds requiredExpert-built dashboards, out of box
    Scope creep managementTask tracking onlyBudget alerts + change order workflows

    Core Capabilities of Enterprise Management Software for Professional Services

    Purpose-built enterprise management software for PS delivery should handle six key areas without having to worry about workarounds or add-on capabilities:

    1. Unified project and portfolio visibility: All active engagements, their status, budget health, and delivery risk, visible in one place.
    2. Resource and capacity management at scale: Real-time alignment of people to projects across the full organization, with skills matching and utilization tracking built in. Accurate resource estimation at the project level feeds directly into portfolio-wide capacity planning.
    3. Project financial management: Cost tracking, margin visibility, and revenue recognition embedded into the delivery workflow, updating in real time as work progresses.
    4. Workflow automation and delivery standardization: Repeatable frameworks that replace manual processes, reduce administrative overhead, and let teams focus on client work instead of coordination.
    5. Business intelligence built for PS leaders: Utilization rates, margin by project and client, forecast accuracy, and bench analysis, available without custom report builds.
    6. Enterprise-grade integrations: Native connectivity to CRM, ERP, and finance systems. Salesforce-native PSA capabilities can be especially important for organizations that need sales pipeline to flow directly into delivery capacity planning.

    How to Choose an Enterprise Management Software

    Software evaluations are easy to win with a polished demo. The harder test is whether a platform performs under the actual conditions of your business. Here are five questions to ask as you weigh your options and help you expose the gap between generic and genuinely purpose-built enterprise management software:

    • Does it track billable utilization and project margin natively, or do we build that visibility ourselves?
    • Can it connect our CRM pipeline directly to delivery capacity without a separate integration project?
    • Does it surface PS-specific KPIs (utilization, margin, forecast accuracy) out of the box?
    • Will it scale across our entities, geographies, and delivery models as we grow?
    • Is this platform purpose-built for professional services, or configured to approximate it?

    How Kantata Powers Enterprise-Scale Project Execution

    Kantata is configured specifically for the needs of professional services — especially enterprise organizations that are balancing large teams and a continuous stream of engagements. It was built from the ground up around the way services organizations actually operate: managing billable people across complex, client-facing project portfolios where every staffing decision has a direct financial consequence.

    The platform covers the full delivery lifecycle in a single environment, from pipeline-connected resource forecasting through project scoping, staffing, execution, financial management, and portfolio intelligence. Every capability is designed to work together, rather than requiring manual data bridges between disconnected tools, because no stage of delivery should require your team to leave the platform and reconcile data elsewhere — this is how Kantata improves the entire project lifecycle, so that your team can always deliver amazing.

    The Standard Has Changed

    For enterprise organizations, the difference between good execution and poor execution can be measured in real dollars that are impacted by missed utilization targets, eroded margins, projects that close late, clients who don’t come back. Improving project performance at this level isn’t a matter of working harder, but working with the tools that will help your team work smarter and more efficiently.

    Purpose-built enterprise management software gives your entire organization a shared operating foundation that has consistent data, connected workflows, and the intelligence to make stronger decisions faster across every engagement.

    The firms winning in professional services have stopped asking whether or not they need this kind of platform. They’re asking how fast they can build on it.

    Find out how Kantata powers enterprise-scale project execution for professional services organizations by scheduling a demo today.

    ,

  • Why AI Is Finally Forcing the Conversation Services Has Been Avoiding for Years

    Why AI Is Finally Forcing the Conversation Services Has Been Avoiding for Years

    Let me be direct: professional services has been talking about value-based and outcomes-based pricing for as long as I can remember. The conversation is not new. Skeptics will rightly say that we’ve been talking about this for nearly 15 years, and no one’s really mastered it.

    They’re not wrong. So why am I telling you that this time is different?

    Because AI capabilities are finally creating the conditions to make this a reality. Not because it’s a good idea. Not because the industry has finally gotten serious. But because the math of the old model stops working the moment an AI agent enters the picture.

    The Hour-Based Model is Breaking Down

    Think about how most services engagements are priced today. Even fixed-fee projects are built on an underlying calculation: Bill Rate x Hours

    Now introduce an AI agent. An agent doesn’t care about hours. Most of its work is immediate. So if we say we’re going to charge price per hour, and the AI agent just did it in a nanosecond — that was a penny. That doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. The pricing model we’ve relied on for decades isn’t imperfect in an AI-driven world. It’s incoherent.

    We have to figure out how to price value, how to price outcomes. And honestly, AI is going to push us to do it in a way that nothing else has before.

    Faster Doesn’t Mean Cheaper

    Here’s where I think a lot of people get tripped up. There’s an assumption baked into conversations about AI-accelerated services: if it’s faster, it must be cheaper. I’d push back on that. Hard.

    Think about almost every other industry. If you get something shipped and you want it faster, you’re going to pay more. Getting things faster is a premium, not a discount. So in services with AI, just because you’re getting it faster doesn’t mean that it’s necessarily cheaper. It could be considered a premium to get something and get value out of it within a week instead of six weeks.

    And here’s the part that really matters: when an agent delivers your work, maybe it didn’t take an hour to do, but it’s been populated with the IP and the expertise of our organization. The agent isn’t operating in a vacuum; it’s running on years of accumulated knowledge, methodology, and hard-won insight.

    This expertise doesn’t disappear because delivery accelerated. If anything, it’s what makes the acceleration possible. You’re not paying for time. You’re paying for the value that’s being generated for you, for the outcome you’re going to be able to achieve within your business.

    What Hybrid Delivery Actually Looks Like

    We’re already starting to see this play out in how services are being packaged and sold. I’m watching Kantata’s customers present their own clients with a choice: Here’s the service if we deliver it completely by humans, and here’s the price and timeline. And here’s the service if we deliver it via human and agent, and the price and timeline for that option. Which would you like?

    This is real. It’s happening now. And it’s doing two important things at once. It’s letting clients opt into AI-augmented delivery when they’re comfortable with it, and it’s making the economics of hybrid delivery transparent and deliberate, rather than hidden inside a black-box engagement.

    Internally, this creates new questions that firms need to be prepared to answer, like:

    • How do we staff a project that includes both people and agents?
    • How do we track what an agent completed?
    • What outcome did the agent achieve, alongside the humans on the project?

    Just like a client might ask for a breakdown of hours spent by human resources, they’re going to want to see the AI agents as well. Our systems need to accommodate that. We need to define what agent productivity looks like, what agent utilization means, and how we want to measure it.

    Why Reliability Changes Everything

    I understand the skepticism. Outcomes-based pricing has always sounded compelling and proven difficult to operationalize. The challenge historically has been in the variables: services delivery involves people, and people introduce unpredictability. Pricing for outcomes when you can’t fully control the path to those outcomes is genuinely hard.

    But agents are reliable. They’re predictable. We’ve tested them. We know what they do and how they perform. It’s much easier to say this agent can deliver an outcome (“we’ve tested it, it’s reliable, it’s predictable, it’s going to get you there every single time”) than it is to say the same about a team of humans navigating a complex engagement. That reliability is exactly what makes outcomes-based pricing structurally viable in a way it simply wasn’t before.

    The Window is Open, But Not Forever

    I think we’re going to talk a ton about this over the next year. We’re going to start to see a lot of people doing it, and doing it successfully. And over the next few years, we’ll start to see some form of value-based or outcome-based pricing become more of a norm.

    The firms that will lead are the ones starting this conversation now, with their clients, with their finance teams, with their technology partners. Not waiting until the old model has fully broken down, but building the new one while there’s still time to do it thoughtfully.

    We can’t discount the fact that the agents are delivering value. They’re full of the IP that we’ve built our companies upon. That’s what’s really generating the value and the cost associated with them. And it’s time our pricing reflected that.

    ,

  • New Study Finds that Professional Services Firms Lose 5–10% of Revenue by Failing to Adopt PSA Software

    New Study Finds that Professional Services Firms Lose 5–10% of Revenue by Failing to Adopt PSA Software

    “Cost of Inaction” research sponsored by Kantata quantifies how administrative drag, misutilization, and billing delays erode millions in value.

    London and Irvine, Calif., March 17, 2026 – Professional services organizations that evaluate but choose not to implement Professional Services Automation (PSA) systems may be quietly losing 5–10% of potential revenue and productivity each year, according to a new IDC White Paper, The Cost of Inaction: The Business Impact of Not Using Professional Services Automation, sponsored by Kantata.

    Unlike traditional ROI studies that examine the benefits of technology adoption, this research modeled what happens when firms consciously decide to delay or avoid PSA investment. IDC found that while many organizations without PSA continue to grow and deliver projects successfully in the short term, the decision to not adopt a PSA solution resulted in a slower rate of growth and improvement along with weakening financial and operational control.

    IDC’s analysis shows that these distributed inefficiencies — including administrative drag, misutilization of talent, unmanaged scope, and delayed billing — compound over time into material financial impact. In one modeled scenario, IDC calculated more than $7 million in annual value erosion from lost billable time, utilization gaps, finance overhead, and revenue leakage

    According to the study, underlying inefficiencies and issues resulting from a lack of PSA include:

    • Up to 20% of skilled employees’ time lost to administration work
    • Up to 10% of employee time lost due to idle capacity caused by misutilization
    • 5% margin leakage from unmanaged scope due to poor variation tracking
    • 3% delay in invoices being issued, leading to delays in billing and revenue recognition
    • Rising employee fatigue and attrition (with associated costs of rehire, burnout, and disengagement)

    The study highlights that budget constraints are by far the biggest factor influencing organizations’ decision not to adopt a PSA. But, as the study states, “data shows the money ‘saved’ by not investing in a PSA system has already been lost through inefficiency, rework, and missed billing.”

    IDC describes this pattern as a compounding cycle of erosion – what one interviewed services leader describes as a “self-reinforcing death spiral” – where manual coordination leads to delayed and inconsistent data, weakening staffing and financial decisions and forcing leaders into reactive management. Because these losses are distributed across project management, resource management, and finance, they often remain invisible until margins tighten or growth stalls.

    Administration work is the primary burden without a PSA solution, with some survey respondents reporting close to 180 steps end-to-end, 40 plus documents to track, and a dozen that must be filled in manually for every project.

    One services leader interviewed for the study explained the impact candidly: “We’re not failing. But we’re working much harder than we should be for the results we’re getting.” Another services leader noted, “In two months, our certainty of utilization dropped from 90% to 60%. We just don’t have visibility. So, we’re either over-hiring or missing revenue opportunities.”

    “This study addresses a question services leaders ask frequently: what happens if we do nothing?” said Nathan Budd, Senior Director, Custom Solutions at IDC and co-author of the study. “Rather than modeling the benefits of adopting new technology, we took a different approach — identifying organizations that evaluated PSA but ultimately made no decision and examining how their businesses evolved afterward. It’s a new way of quantifying business risk, and it shows how small inefficiencies in systems and processes compound over time into structural margin and control challenges.”

    The Cost of Inaction study complements recent IDC Business Value research sponsored by Kantata that examines the measurable gains achieved by organizations that implemented Kantata’s PSA platform. Together, the studies present a two-sided view of PSA impact: the performance upside of adoption and the financial downside of delay.

    “AI is forcing services firms to rethink how they sell and deliver their expertise while also pushing them to grow revenue without adding headcount — in that world, unpredictability becomes prohibitively expensive,” said Sarah Edwards, Chief Product Strategy Officer at Kantata. “What makes this research so important is that it looks at a question most studies avoid: what actually happens when organizations decide not to act. Too often the decision to maintain the status quo feels safe in the moment, but this study shows that inefficiencies compound, eroding control, profitability, and confidence over time. That’s why getting the foundations right matters so much. Without connected data and processes, services firms can’t fully realize the potential of AI or manage their businesses with confidence.”

    For this research, IDC surveyed 100 professional services organizations in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom and conducted three in-depth case study interviews with service leaders whose firms had evaluated PSA solutions within the past five years but chose not to adopt one. The study examines how operational gaps in project delivery, resource management, and financial processes compound into long-term performance erosion

    For additional insights and to download a full copy of report, click here: The Cost of Inaction: The Business Impact of Not Using Professional Services Automation.

    About Kantata
    Kantata is a leading provider of Professional Services Automation (PSA) solutions that help professional services organizations and agencies ensure consistent excellence and profitability across projects. More than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Kantata to instantly assemble the ideal team, easily amplify institutional knowledge, and confidently forecast outcomes. Recognized as a Leader on G2’s PSA Software Grid® and Resource Management Software Grid®, and consistently ranked among the top project management software products in G2’s annual Best Software Awards, Kantata supports the full services lifecycle — from scoping and staffing to delivery and forecasting. For more information, visit www.kantata.com.

    IDC White Paper, sponsored by Kantata, The Cost of Inaction, The Business Impact of Not Using Professional Services Automation, #EUR154271426-WP, February 2026

    #

    For more media information, contact:
    Lisa Hendrickson/LCH Communications for Kantata
    516-643-1642
    lisa@lchcommunications.com

  • What’s the Business Value of Professional Services Automation Software? A New Study Quantifies the Impact

    What’s the Business Value of Professional Services Automation Software? A New Study Quantifies the Impact

    What would it mean for your organization if on-time project delivery increased by 33%? Or if the number of projects running over budget decreased by 61%?

    For many professional services leaders, improvements like these would fundamentally change how their organizations operate — from how projects are planned and staffed to how teams collaborate and deliver value to clients.

    Yet many firms still run their services operations across spreadsheets, disconnected tools, and manual processes, keeping improvements of that scale out of reach. Project plans live in one system, resource plans in another, and financial data somewhere else entirely. The result is a constant struggle to answer basic questions:

    • Are our projects on track?
    • Do we have the right people available for upcoming work?
    • Are we actually delivering engagements profitably?

    To better understand the real impact of solving these challenges, Kantata sponsored a Business Value study conducted by IDC. The research focused specifically on organizations that adopted Kantata’s Professional Services Automation (PSA) platform and examined the operational and financial outcomes that followed. Importantly, the organizations interviewed for the study were not previously using a PSA platform. In other words, the research captured the impact of moving from fragmented tools and manual coordination to a unified services operations platform for the first time.

    IDC found that organizations realized an average of $17 million in annual benefits, driven by improvements in staff productivity and business enablement. Just as importantly, those gains came not from reducing headcount, but from reclaiming time previously lost to manual coordination, fragmented reporting, and reactive planning.

    One of the clearest impacts of PSA adoption was more consistent and predictable project execution. According to IDC, organizations experienced:

    • 33% more projects delivered on time
    • 61% decrease in projects running over budget
    • 12% shorter average project duration

    The impact wasn’t just felt on a project-by-project level, but across portfolios — Kantata customers also reported a 78% improvement in portfolio-level reporting accuracy. These improvements were driven by Kantata’s integrated planning tools, including Gantt charts, task tracking, and real-time burn analysis. Organizations also experienced a 40% improvement in resource planning accuracy and made staffing decisions 60% faster.

    Operational improvements translated into measurable workforce and client impact. IDC found a 32% increase in employee satisfaction and a 60% decrease in projects receiving complaints or escalations.

    As one interviewed organization noted, “We’re now able to catch issues early, reducing overruns and eliminating surprises. Before, we’d reach the end of a project and wonder where the overages came from. Now with weekly metric reviews and proactive alerts, we have far more control over our project portfolio.”

    Finance teams also realized significant gains. IDC reported a 61% reduction in month-end close time, from 11.5 days to 4.5 days, along with a 51.5% efficiency gain for finance teams. Organizations increased billable hours per consultant by 16.7% and reduced revenue and cost leakage by 1%, representing $3.7 million in business value annually across the interviewed firms.

    IDC concluded that Kantata delivers measurable value across project delivery, resource management, and financial operations, enabling proactive planning, stronger cross-functional collaboration, and more confident decision-making.

    No matter which way you slice it, improvements like these would be transformational for any services organization. But today’s environment raises the stakes even further. As professional services firms face increasing margin pressure, rising client expectations, and more complex delivery models, predictability has become a strategic advantage.

    When projects and staffing are unpredictable, it doesn’t just impact the bottom line — it impacts people and clients. What I believe IDC’s research makes clear is that when firms connect scoping, resourcing, delivery, and financial management in our intelligent platform, they can reduce volatility, strengthen employee engagement, and consistently deliver amazing outcomes for their customers.

    IDC conducted five in-depth interviews with Kantata customers across industries including IT consulting, web development, managed services, digital strategy, and healthcare technology. The organizations had a median of 250 employees and managed up to 12,000 projects annually using Kantata. IDC’s Business Value methodology uses a before-and-after assessment model to quantify benefits related to staff productivity, operational efficiency, and financial performance.

    For additional insights and to download a full copy of The Business Value of Kantata, visit www.kantata.com/resource/business-value-of-kantata

    IDC Business Value Solution Brief, sponsored by Kantata, The Business Value of Kantata, # EUR253817925, October 2025

    ,

  • Kantata Earns Spot on G2’s 2026 Best Software Awards for Project Management Products

    Kantata Earns Spot on G2’s 2026 Best Software Awards for Project Management Products

    London and Irvine, Calif, Feb. 18, 2026 – Kantata, a leading global provider of Professional Services Automation (PSA) solutions, today announced it has been named to G2’s 2026 Best Software Awards, ranking #32 on the Project Management Products list This marks seven consecutive years of Kantata earning a spot among the top 50 Project Management Products, highlighting its sustained impact in a market often dominated by general work management tools.

    As the world’s largest and most trusted software marketplace, G2 reaches over 100 million buyers annually. Its annual Best Software Awards rank the world’s best software companies and products based on authentic, timely reviews from real users. Kantata’s continued recognition as one of the highest-ranked PSA platforms in G2’s annual Project Management Products awards underscores the clear demand for specialized project management solutions designed for the way professional services firms actually operate.

    “It’s an honor to see Kantata ranked among the top project management solutions year after year,” said Charles Gustine, Director of Customer and Market Insights at Kantata. “G2’s user community continues to validate our commitment to pushing boundaries with innovations like Kantata’s Expertise Engine and AI-driven capabilities designed specifically for professional services. In this industry, projects are the business — and when they’re overly unpredictable, performance suffers. Our focus is on giving services organizations a connected system that captures what drives successful outcomes — and applies that intelligence in real time to reduce unpredictability and ensure consistent excellence and profitability across every project.”

    Verified reviews from services professionals on G2 highlight Kantata’s impact across project delivery, resource management, and financial performance:

    • “The software allows me to deliver detailed, professional service-based project plans and sprint plans with ease. I find its sleek look and feel, along with the modern Gantt charts, to be a significant advantage in project and account management. The Kantata AI Assistant and copy/paste functionality are beneficial, assisting in time optimization and organized project plans. I also value the ever-evolving functionality, with monthly and quarterly updates that keep up with AI and modern technology advances.”
    • “Kantata Professional Services Automation provides strong end-to-end visibility across project delivery, resource management, and financial performance. I particularly value the integrated approach that connects project planning, time and expense tracking, resource allocation, and revenue forecasting in a single platform. The reporting and analytics capabilities are helpful for understanding project health, utilization, and margins, and the system supports structured governance and scalability for professional services organizations. Overall, it helps improve transparency, decision-making, and operational discipline across projects.”
    • “The Kantata team understands that each company has different needs. They have invested significant effort and time to meet our consulting team where it is, in terms of sophistication on project management, resource utilization, and capacity. They’ve sought to understand how we operate, invested in workflows that automate common pain points for our consultants, and challenged us when we’re not using the system in the optimal fashion. Specifically they have worked with us to streamline how we schedule hours across our team, which has unique aspects from other consulting businesses. Through this we’ve seen greatly improved accuracy in our forecasting metrics, with less effort required from our consultants.”

    “As buyers increasingly shift to AI-driven research to discover software solutions, being recommended in the ‘answer moment’ must be earned with credible proof,” said Godard Abel, co-founder and CEO at G2. “Our Best Software Awards are grounded in trusted data from authentic customer reviews. They not only give buyers an objective, reliable guide to the products that help teams do their best work, but they’re also the proof AI search platforms rely on when sourcing answers. Congratulations to this year’s winners, including Kantata. Earning a spot on these lists signals real customer impact.”

    About G2’s Best Software Awards

    G2’s 2026 Best Software Awards feature dozens of award lists, ranking software vendors and products using G2’s proprietary algorithm. The results are based on G2’s verified user reviews and publicly available market presence data. To be eligible for the Best Software Awards, a software company or product must have received at least 10 approved reviews during the 2025 calendar year. Scores reflect only data from reviews submitted during this evaluation period. To learn more, view G2’s 2026 Best Software Awards and read more about G2’s methodology.

    About G2

    G2 is the world’s largest and most trusted software marketplace. More than 100 million people annually — including employees at all Fortune 500 companies — use G2 to make smarter software decisions based on authentic peer reviews. Thousands of software and services companies of all sizes partner with G2 to build their reputation and grow their business — including Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoom, and Adobe. To learn more about where you go for software, visit www.g2.com and follow G2 on LinkedIn.

    About Kantata

    Kantata takes professional services automation to a new level, giving people-powered businesses the clarity, control, and confidence they need to optimize resource planning and elevate operational performance. Our purpose-built cloud software is helping over 1,500 professional services organizations in more than 100 countries focus and optimize their most important asset: their people. With Kantata, PS firms gain access to the information and tools they need to win more business, ensure the right people are always available at the right time, and delight clients with project delivery and outcomes. To learn more, visit www.kantata.com.

    #

    For more media information, contact:
    Lisa Hendrickson/LCH Communications for Kantata
    516-643-1642
    lisa@lchcommunications.com

    Michael Wood for G2
    press@g2.com

  • Why ASC 606 Matters to Professional Services Organizations

    Why ASC 606 Matters to Professional Services Organizations

    Does your professional services organization know exactly where it’s making its money, or just where it thinks it is? Revenue recognition is the mechanism that closes that gap, defining precisely when and how revenue is earned throughout the accrual accounting process.

    For professional services organizations, that distinction is everything. Revenue is rarely earned all at once. It unfolds across milestones, deliverables, and long-running client relationships, often shaped by change orders, variable scope, and evolving delivery models. When revenue recognition lags behind operational reality, financial reporting becomes less reliable and leadership decisions suffer as a result.

    This is where ASC 606 comes into play. As the authoritative standard for revenue recognition, ASC 606 establishes a consistent, principles-based framework for recognizing revenue from customer contracts. Compliance is not simply an accounting exercise to directly impact forecasting accuracy, margin visibility, audit readiness, and leadership confidence in the numbers guiding the business.

    By understanding what ASC 606 is, why it matters, how it works, and how it applies to professional services organizations, firms can move beyond compliance toward financial clarity and control.

    Kantata can help you maximize every dollar. Learn about real-time financial data.
    LEARN MORE

    What is ASC 606?

    ASC 606 is a revenue recognition standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to standardize how organizations recognize revenue from contracts with customers. Prior to its introduction, revenue recognition guidance was fragmented across industries, leading to inconsistent reporting and limited comparability between companies.

    ASC 606 replaces industry-specific rules with a single, principles-based model designed to reflect the transfer of value to the customer. The goal is simple in theory but complex in execution: recognize revenue in a way that faithfully represents how and when goods or services are delivered.

    For professional services organizations, ASC 606 is particularly impactful because revenue is often earned over time rather than at a single point. Engagements may span months or years, involve multiple deliverables, and include variable pricing tied to performance, usage, or outcomes. ASC 606 provides the framework to account for that complexity consistently, but only if firms can align contracts, delivery, and financial reporting.

    Understanding the ASC 606 Model

    ASC 606 was established in 2014 to standardize how companies recognize revenue from contracts with customers. At its core is a five-step model designed to align revenue recognition with the transfer of value.

    This five-step model provides a clear framework for revenue reporting:

    Step 1: Identifying the Contract

    Determine whether a customer agreement meets the criteria to be accounted for under ASC 606, including approval, enforceable rights, and defined payment terms.

    Step 2: Identifying Performance Obligations

    Identify the distinct performance obligations in the contract. These are the promised services or deliverables that provide value to the customer, whether delivered individually or over time.

    Step 3: Determining the Transaction Price

    Define the amount the organization expects to be entitled to in exchange for fulfilling the contract. For professional services firms, this often includes variable consideration such as discounts, incentives, usage-based fees, or contingent pricing.

    Step 4: Allocating the Transaction Price

    Allocate the transaction price to each distinct performance obligation based on relative standalone selling prices. This step frequently introduces complexity for services organizations managing bundled offerings or blended delivery models.

    Step 5: Recognizing Revenue

    Recognize revenue when control of the promised service transfers to the customer. In professional services, this commonly occurs over time, requiring accurate progress tracking and close alignment between delivery and finance.

    ASC 606’s international counterpart, IFRS 15, mirrors this five-step framework, supporting consistency across global financial reporting. For organizations operating internationally, understanding both standards is essential to maintaining alignment between regional operations and consolidated financials.

    Relevance to Professional Services Organizations

    Revenue recognition is uniquely challenging for professional services organizations. Engagements are rarely linear, and revenue models often combine time and materials work, fixed-price milestones, retainers, and recurring subscriptions within a single client relationship.

    ASC 606 provides the structure to handle this complexity, but structure alone is not enough. Manual spreadsheets, disconnected systems, and after-the-fact reconciliations make compliance harder than it needs to be and obscure the real drivers of margin performance.

    Strong, purpose-built professional services management software enables firms to operationalize ASC 606 by connecting contracts, project delivery, and financials in a single system of record. This alignment allows organizations to recognize revenue accurately as work progresses, adapt to scope changes without downstream disruption, and maintain confidence in reported results.

    Kantata: Enabling Compliance and Maturity

    Kantata plays a key role in helping professional services organizations operationalize ASC 606, not just comply with it. Our platform aggregates project, contract, and financial data in real time, giving finance and delivery leaders a shared, accurate view of revenue as it is earned.

    By automating revenue calculations and streamlining period-end close processes, Kantata reduces manual effort and risk while improving visibility into both recognized and deferred revenue. This clarity supports better forecasting, smoother audits, and more informed decision-making across the organization.
    At Kantata, we see ASC 606 compliance as a foundation for financial maturity, not a finish line.

    When revenue recognition reflects how work is actually delivered, professional services organizations gain the insight they need to protect margins, scale responsibly, and compete with confidence. With Kantata, revenue recognition becomes a strategic asset, helping firms win where it matters most.

    ,